CO129-355 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [1-3] — Page 160

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

CONFIDENTIAL.

Government House, Hongkong, 13th February, 1909.

In my Despatch Confidential of the 6th of last August, I informed Your Lordship that cracks had appeared in various Bridges of the British section of the Kowloon-Canton Railway, and I detailed the steps which I had taken in the matter.

In Your Lordship's reply dated 23rd October, 1908, you expressed the view that my action in enlisting the services of Mr. J. Williams to assist me in arriving at a conclusion as to the conflicting technical views expressed by the Chief Resident Engineer and the Director of Public Works was unadvisable, and you further informed me that the Consulting Engineers were in no way financially responsible for any unestimated expenditure which might be caused by errors committed by the Chief Resident Engineer whom they had nominated.

You added that Mr. J. A. Barry would shortly come out here to inspect the Bridges, and to advise on ...

Page 7


... it deals with The Secretary of State's criticism of Sir F. Lugard's action.

We might, however, communicate to ... No despatch ... and say that The Secretary of State would be glad to receive ... remarks ... on ... forwarding papers ... Mr. Barry's ... 32 128.

I saw Mr. Wolfe Barry's telegram go the other way.

The Consulting Engineers when they report...

... marked him what he had heard from Mr. Barry who had just returned.

The emphasis was on a bad Mussiniers (who is now here at present despatch) that they were reporting originally ... had known there ... fact ... 67 die ... Thing and sim 374 29 105.

Doubtless if earlier, the dash... 47. die ... modified.

...

Page 8


...

Mr. Stables ... to proceed ... 4 Be 24/3 545.

To it necessary to remind CA? no it is disposed of 4 com 18907. 59H 23 23/7.

Watme ... 263 ... no Amc BW 24/7 - armee.

My Lord, C.O. 159 ... 9334 ... Race 17 MAR OS.

CA. F7429.

Edit History

2026-06-07 19:58:51 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
CONFIDENTIAL. Government House, Hongkong, 13th February, 1909. In my Despatch Confidential of the 6th of last August, I informed Your Lordship that cracks had appeared in various Bridges of the British section of the Kowloon-Canton Railway, and I detailed the steps which I had taken in the matter. In Your Lordship's reply dated 23rd October, 1908, you expressed the view that my action in enlisting the services of Mr. J. Williams to assist me in arriving at a conclusion as to the conflicting technical views expressed by the Chief Resident Engineer and the Director of Public Works was unadvisable, and you further informed me that the Consulting Engineers were in no way financially responsible for any unestimated expenditure which might be caused by errors committed by the Chief Resident Engineer whom they had nominated. You added that Mr. J. A. Barry would shortly come out here to inspect the Bridges, and to advise on ... Page 7 ... it deals with The Secretary of State's criticism of Sir F. Lugard's action. We might, however, communicate to ... No despatch ... and say that The Secretary of State would be glad to receive ... remarks ... on ... forwarding papers ... Mr. Barry's ... 32 128. I saw Mr. Wolfe Barry's telegram go the other way. The Consulting Engineers when they report... ... marked him what he had heard from Mr. Barry who had just returned. The emphasis was on a bad Mussiniers (who is now here at present despatch) that they were reporting originally ... had known there ... fact ... 67 die ... Thing and sim 374 29 105. Doubtless if earlier, the dash... 47. die ... modified. ... Page 8 ... Mr. Stables ... to proceed ... 4 Be 24/3 545. To it necessary to remind CA? no it is disposed of 4 com 18907. 59H 23 23/7. Watme ... 263 ... no Amc BW 24/7 - armee. My Lord, C.O. 159 ... 9334 ... Race 17 MAR OS. CA. F7429.
Baseline (Original)
7 ? as it deals q with The S. gs. criticism Sin F. Lugard's action. We might however Rom the rest · communicate to No desp. and Ra TIDENTIAL. T Hongkong. end. and say Dat The Sqs cool be gla to receive Re viciis 8 have on aire forwarding Lapers M. Barry's 32 128 I saw I Wolfe Bary ferdags go, t way. The Consulting Engineers when they report. {ght 24/3 a arked him what he had heard from Mag. Barry whored just returned. The emphas ths it was a bad Musiniers (who is shener Ette present desp) that they were reporting ginally g fomible had knew there facti 67 die Thing and sim 374 29 105 Doubtless if Earlier, the dash. 47. die سند کی modified. The fish thing Причей He Harding guing a porsion possibl Dr. 24/5 In Hopwood los Mr Stabes to proced 4 Be 24/3 545 To it necessary to remind CA? no it is disposed of 4 com 18907. 59H 23 23/7 Watme 263 no Amc BW 24/7- armee **y Lord, C.O 159 9334 Race 17 MAR OS Goverment House, Hongkong, 13th.February, 1909. In my Despatch Confidential of the "th. of last August, I informed Your Lordship that cracks had appeared in various Pridres of the British rection of the Kowloon-Canton Railway, and I detailed the steps which I had taken in the matter. In Your Lordship's CA. F7429 reply dated 23rd. October, 1908, you expressed the view that my action in enlisting the services of le 4. J = Williams to assist me in arriving at a conclusion as to the conflicting technical views expressed by the Chief Resident Engineer and the Director of Public Works was un- -advisable, and you further informed me that the Consult- -ing Engireers were in no way financially responsible for any unestimated expenditure which might be caused by errors committed by the Chief Resident Engineer whom they had nominated. You added that Fr. A. J. Barry would shortly come out here to inspect the Bridres, and to advise on Railway OHT HOʻOURABLJ FOR TART, OF CRYTE, 30...
2026-06-07 19:58:51 · Baseline
View content

7

?

as

it deals

q

with

The S. gs. criticism

Sin F. Lugard's action.

We might however

Rom the rest

·

communicate to

No desp.

and

Ra

TIDENTIAL.

T

Hongkong.

end.

and say

Dat The Sqs cool

be gla

to receive

Re

viciis

8

have

on

aire

forwarding

Lapers

M. Barry's

32 128

I saw I Wolfe Bary

ferdags go, t

way.

The Consulting Engineers

when they

report.

{ght 24/3

a

arked him what he had heard from Mag.

Barry whored just returned. The emphas

ths it was a

bad Musiniers (who is shener Ette

present desp) that they were reporting

ginally

g

fomible

had knew there facti 67 die Thing and sim 374 29 105

Doubtless if Earlier, the dash. 47. die

سند کی

modified.

The fish thing

Причей

He Harding

guing a porsion

possibl

Dr.

24/5

In Hopwood

los

Mr Stabes

to proced

4 Be 24/3 545

To it necessary to remind CA? no it is disposed of 4 com

18907. 59H 23 23/7

Watme

263

no Amc BW 24/7- armee

**y Lord,

C.O

159

9334

Race 17 MAR OS

Goverment House,

Hongkong, 13th.February, 1909.

In my Despatch Confidential of

the "th. of last August, I informed Your Lordship that

cracks had appeared in various Pridres of the British

rection of the Kowloon-Canton Railway, and I detailed the

steps which I had taken in the matter. In Your Lordship's

CA. F7429

reply dated 23rd. October, 1908, you expressed the view

that my action in enlisting the services of le 4. J

=

Williams to assist me in arriving at a conclusion as to

the conflicting technical views expressed by the Chief

Resident Engineer and the Director of Public Works was un-

-advisable, and you further informed me that the Consult-

-ing Engireers were in no way financially responsible for

any unestimated expenditure which might be caused by

errors committed by the Chief Resident Engineer whom they

had nominated. You added that Fr. A. J. Barry would shortly

come out here to inspect the Bridres, and to advise on

Railway

OHT HOʻOURABLJ

FOR TART, OF CRYTE,

30...

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.